Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision reddit. This change has occurred .
Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision reddit In my field, "major revision" means do the work and we'll decide if it's good enough, including possibly sending to new reviewers, and there's a very good chance it could still be rejected. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. What type of major revisions did you get? is like repeating some experiments or writing a new section. 06. This change has occurred The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days Then after submiting the minor revisions and waiting for two months I got major revision request and I was shocked. 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. Any thoughts? Oct 24, 2018 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). 07. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. My question is how did it happen after minor revisions? From the start the 3rd reviewer was highly rejective while the first two positive. Here the status could show "Editor assigned", or it could show "awaiting reviewer invitation". During reject and resubmit, I got comments from 2 reviewers, and Sep 20, 2017 · I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. Diterima dengan A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 Reddit. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. It is just guessing. One recommended major revision, two recommended minor revision, and one recommended acceptance. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 6 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6. Know what the reviewers have asked you to do. Ditolak 2. What does this mean? Meaning of change from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to Awaiting Reviewer Selection Jun 9, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). 14, awaiting reviewer selection. e. Jul 26, 2024 · the reason for my question is to understand what are the circumstances that make the editor change the status from completed to assigned. This change has occurred Sep 12, 2022 · Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. The EiC at that time said they'll look Aug 3, 2021 · Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Jun 16, 2020 · Coming to your query, what ‘Editorial assignment pending’ at this stage means is that your revised manuscript is awaiting a review by an associate editor (AE). However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Aug 9, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Aug 24, 2021 · Hi. The status after 3 days . May 30, 2020 · My manuscript status in the ScholarOne submission system remained 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for three months and then changed to 'Under Review. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". 8 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Review and Revision Time for Manuscripts Submitted to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Now I am curious about what this might mean. Try to approach the process as someone who is trying to get better science published. This status change occurs approximately every few days. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. Jan 31, 2024 · "Awaiting recommendation" means the manuscript's peer review process has been completed, and the handling editor has sent such manuscript to the chief editor to decide whether After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 30 submit 5. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. Major revision in June 2023 (accepted by reviewers 3-4, reviewer 5 is nowhere to be found, a new reviewer 6 rejects the submission) Reviewer 6 said that this whole category of methods is not valid. authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. Sometimes after reading the second time, reviewers may have a better understanding of the paper. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by Admin Dashboard （管理者ダッシュボード）に表示される査読プロセス中の論文ステータスは以下の通りです。 My journal submission status is still “awaiting reviewer selection” after nearly 3 months. It's impossible to make a generalization across all journals and all specialties. Either the desk editor (i. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. 28 submitted 22. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. or does the editor might assign new reviewers to evaluate the revised manuscript. After another month, I got back the review, asking to work on minor revisions. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is May 1, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". 04. Good luck! Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. 22. This change has occurred Latest Articles. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Mar 13, 2022 · If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. Handling the R&R is important. For "good" business journals the rejection rate is something like: 30% desk rejected by the editor before going to review, 40-60% rejected in the first round of review, 10-20% rejected in subsequent rounds of review, only 5-10% papers submitted are actually published. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. But now, three weeks have passed and At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Recommendation can also be "get reviewer to clarify" so it goes back to the review cycle. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I just got a major revision request and the feedback seems pretty straightforward to address. uk has a great post or two about why review can take so long Jul 23, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. These revisions were trivial, and so I resubmitted after one week. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. The title says it all. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. " Does this Mar 28, 2015 · AE stands for "Associate Editor. Sep 11, 2017 · In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. We’re in a field where the specifics of how data were analyzed can make a huge difference to the conclusions. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Feb 26, 2021 · After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. There is nothing wrong with but it can be annoying as it can delay the publication of the work. The paper goes into official review; one reviewer is extremely critical (I suspect rejection or major revision), the other reviewer is very positive with a few helpful comments and criticisms(I suspect major or minor revision). The status “'Awaiting AE evaluation'” means that that the peer review has been completed and now the Assigned Editor (AE) will consider the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. Awaiting Editor Decision Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. Also, the second round took 8 months. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Hi there! Major revision is a positive decision in my opinion. But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". I was wondering about the chances of the manuscript being Mar 16, 2022 · I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. This change has occurred It is not unusual to introduce a new reviewer at the second review round. ) I know that revisions, both major and minor, hint at a higher chance of acceptance. 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but Second time major revision what should I do It is reviewer 2 again, the paper is submitted to high impact journal and after one year I got revision, I did this in less than one month middle of work required by my supervisor. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. I think of a major revision as one that involves substantial changes to the manuscript. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. Aug 12, 2019 · I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Feb 15, 2023 · Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). 30 TE verifies reviewer comments Peer Review in Progress. " my paper went from "under review" to awaiting EIC decision after about 5 and a half weeks. This change has occurred Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments Nov 30, 2020 · The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Anyone who knows me, even just professionally or as an acquaintance, will recognize it as me. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. July 5, 2023, minor revision. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. « Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. This can include conducting new data analysis or experiments, overhauling or substantially reframing the literature review or discussion section, or integrating a substantial amount of new background research. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. I have already addressed 4 peer-reviewers, and in my last submission I addressed the comments of the 4th reviewer. 25 Awaiting EIC decision 01. Sometimes the handling administrator or editor are on holiday or busy. 28 Awaiting EA Decision 6. My personal definition of major-revisions as a reviewer is that I'm asking the author to do additional experiments or analysis, but if they do that work, the paper is suitable for publication. THANKS!! 2 days ago · Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with the editor or reviewers, or both? Mar 5, 2019 · I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. Nov 22, 2021 · Thank you for your question. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. This change has occurred Nov 16, 2015 · Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. So I'm wondering which one this response is. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article should be published or not. This change has occurred Aug 4, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 29 submitted after major revision 22. 7 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 11. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. Now what I got is the 3rd reviewers comments only while others suggested publication. Some more problems may pop-up. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Get help with your research Why the status of my REVISED manuscript changed from "under review" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? and later got a decision of major revision. Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. Should I Nov 5, 2019 · However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. 17 major revision 22. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Status shows "Revision submitted to journal". 28 Major Revision 8. Apr 27, 2017 · I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. I submit my comments Sep 17, 2019 · You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. After Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. The decision was major revision. Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes me think that this reviewer could be a new one. Jul 12, 2023 · 三三三三三三 2023-07-12 March 10, 2023, submission. 05. Both reviews were positive about the future of the article. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. What’s the deal with this? The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. Feb 17, 2021 · Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. I’ve also had the “here’s a major revision, but f*** you if you can actually complete the work” long shot type of major revisions. 21, awaiting AE decision. 12. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. [email protected] Submitted my paper. Revise and resubmit, however, is likely followed by a rejection. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. The editor seemed enthusiastic about the paper, and asked for the revisions before acceptance. 26 Awaiting Editorial This subreddit is a place where high income professionals of all types can ask, answer, discuss, and debate the personal finance and investing questions specific to our unique situations without being criticized, ostracized, or downvoted simply for having a high income and "first world" problems. Nov 19, 2020 · I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Yeah just send the journal a message. This change has occurred Aug 21, 2023 · 论文小修后await. 2023. Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. 6. Okay, it has been sent for review again. This change has occurred Sep 6, 2021 · A major revision was submitted to a journal. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. What do I do? So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status? Jun 24, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Has anyone had this experience Feb 18, 2022 · Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Is it a bad sign? Is it ok if I send them an email? Reviewer 1 recommended acceptance with minor revisions and Reviewer 2 wanted major revisions before considering it further. 15-6. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control and added value to you in the form of constructive feedback. This change has occurred If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to the editor and [email protected] Submitted my paper. I have submitted a paper to an Elsevier journal and have already gone through 4 rounds of peer review and the editors have suggested a major revision each time. ' What does this change indicate? Does this indicate a rejection from the editor? An R&R even with major revisions and a negative review means the paper is at least good enough to consider publishing. The article has been returned to reviewers after a major-revisions decision every time in my experience, both as an author and a reviewer. The EiC at that time said they'll look I resubmit, including responses to the editors' review. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. However, the editor has sent out another review invitation (#5 Reviewer). 25 Minor Revision 11. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Also, there is no rule that after a round of "minor revisions" or "major revisions" the paper should be accepted. To be honest, I don't even want to make any more changes, submitting is too frustrating. Noticed a mistake in research paper after a 'major revision' decision Research Hello everyone, so my research paper was reviewed with a request for 'major revision' (Q1 journal, related to biomedical engineering). same "review complete" status but different date. This change has occurred May 6, 2021 · Your paper is resubmitted. " This status has not been changed for a month. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed Awaiting recommendations: waiting for an editor to make a recommendation Recommendation can be "get another review" so it goes back to the review cycle. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" (We had four reviewers. 08. Mar 13, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 12 Pre-accepted Translation: 5. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. But in general, revise and resubmit with major revisions means that there are substantial changes that need to be made and you need to go to all possible lengths to satisfy the reviewers' comments. I am not Jul 9, 2019 · In the first notification, I got a major revision. If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. But my question is as below. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. 20 Major Revision 12. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. June 2, 2023, major revision. If a reviewer sounds unreasonable, you can appropriately write your response explaining why you think you’re correct and the comments wouldn’t apply to your paper. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. academicjournalpublishing. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. 19 Awaiting AEIC recommendation 01. It seems like 5 weeks is a very short time for it to be peer-reviewed, but almost 6 weeks under review seems like a long time for them to just desk reject it. This change has occurred My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. It was perhaps a minor revision or not a very extensive major revision. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Aug 31, 2019 · I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating Aug 16, 2024 · After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. . Does that mean one of the reviewer reject the paper after major revision or he excused that he couldn't revise it and if that yes how can the reviewing completed then. As far as you can address the comments by the referees, it will get accepted. example of cover page for assignment; how to write a cover letter for delivery driver; to do or make a speech; what does assignment mean in education; explaining Jan 19, 2021 · After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. They had major revisions, reanalyzed the data per the reviewers’ request. So, please give me advice. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. 03. This has happened several times. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. 25 Rejected First review: 4 reviewers, minor revision, two major revisions, one rejection, editor gave rejection. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field (biomedical science) when submitting to a decently high IF journal, I think? Do most of the post peer review rejections with these journals come after the first round of review? With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. Jul 1, 2017 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). This change has occurred The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Feb 14, 2023 · After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Mar 10, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. t backed up) waiting to be sent to some reviews. 9 Awaiting AE Recommendation 11. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where Jun 9, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. 20 awaiting AE Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural form) recommendations. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. The journal where I’m an AE got rid of the major revisions category a couple years back after a nasty fight with an author. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. 5. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). The status of the paper changed several times. 12. 10. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. So, perhaps the AE believes they can check the manuscript on their own. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. I don't think anyone should be embarrassed by a negative review, and it is quite common that everyone is bound to run into a negative reviewer (usually it's reviewer #2) at some point. Unfortunately I have an asshole supervisor who is aggressive bully and not supportive. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. 6. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. 18 Awaiting AE Recommendation 6. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? Dec 12, 2019 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. But again it all depends upon the type of revision That's all really good advice. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. Translation: 21. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. The comments were entirely new. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. Feb 24, 2023 · 12. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. the employee of the publisher assigned to the journal) or the editor-in-chief assigns an editorial board member to handle the paper. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。 原因有以下几点：1. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. It’ll take work and a second revision after this one most likely, but I’m confident we will get it done. A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. Reviewer 2 is usually a grad student who was given the assignment by their PI and has a bone to pick with the editorial process. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. Nov 12, 2018 · The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. It's different for every journal. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". 31 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of comments from the same reviewers. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. r/academia • I am an academic who participated in a study and found my (very) identifying information in a PhD student's paper. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Nov 21, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. blogspot. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. co. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers.
kmgmk
kjpsq
bev
anot
fuktn
jcvvl
fewss
vhiwtq
lipn
vihrs